dependent-auto.cpp
1.41 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -std=c++11
template<typename T>
struct only {
only(T);
template<typename U> only(U) = delete; // expected-note {{here}}
};
template<typename ...T>
void f(T ...t) {
auto x(t...); // expected-error {{is empty}} expected-error {{contains multiple expressions}}
only<int> check = x;
}
void g() {
f(); // expected-note {{here}}
f(0);
f(0, 1); // expected-note {{here}}
}
template<typename T>
bool h(T t) {
auto a = t;
decltype(a) b;
a = a + b;
auto p = new auto(t);
only<double*> test = p; // expected-error {{conversion function from 'char *' to 'only<double *>'}}
return p;
}
bool b = h('x'); // expected-note {{here}}
// PR 9276 - Make sure we check auto types deduce the same
// in the case of a dependent initializer
namespace PR9276 {
template<typename T>
void f() {
auto i = T(), j = 0; // expected-error {{deduced as 'long' in declaration of 'i' and deduced as 'int' in declaration of 'j'}}
}
void g() {
f<long>(); // expected-note {{here}}
f<int>();
}
}
namespace NoRepeatedDiagnostic {
template<typename T>
void f() {
auto a = 0, b = 0.0, c = T(); // expected-error {{deduced as 'int' in declaration of 'a' and deduced as 'double' in declaration of 'b'}}
}
// We've already diagnosed an issue. No extra diagnostics is needed for these.
template void f<int>();
template void f<double>();
template void f<char>();
}