base-pointer-and-cmpxchg.ll
2.71 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-macosx -mattr=+cx16 -x86-use-base-pointer=true -stackrealign -stack-alignment=32 %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=USE_BASE --check-prefix=USE_BASE_64 %s
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-macosx -mattr=+cx16 -x86-use-base-pointer=false -stackrealign -stack-alignment=32 %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=DONT_USE_BASE %s
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnux32 -mattr=+cx16 -x86-use-base-pointer=true -stackrealign -stack-alignment=32 %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=USE_BASE --check-prefix=USE_BASE_32 %s
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnux32 -mattr=+cx16 -x86-use-base-pointer=false -stackrealign -stack-alignment=32 %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=DONT_USE_BASE %s
; This function uses dynamic allocated stack to force the use
; of a frame pointer.
; The inline asm clobbers a bunch of registers to make sure
; the frame pointer will need to be used (for spilling in that case).
;
; Then, we check that when we use rbx as the base pointer,
; we do not use cmpxchg, since using that instruction requires
; to clobbers rbx to set the arguments of the instruction and when
; rbx is used as the base pointer, RA cannot fix the code for us.
;
; CHECK-LABEL: cmp_and_swap16:
; Check that we actually use rbx.
; gnux32 use the 32bit variant of the registers.
; USE_BASE_64: movq %rsp, %rbx
; USE_BASE_32: movl %esp, %ebx
;
; Make sure the base pointer is saved before the rbx argument for
; cmpxchg16b is set.
;
; Because of how the test is written, we spill SAVE_rbx.
; However, it would have been perfectly fine to just keep it in register.
; USE_BASE: movq %rbx, [[SAVE_rbx_SLOT:[0-9]*\(%[er]bx\)]]
;
; SAVE_rbx must be in register before we clobber rbx.
; It is fine to use any register but rbx and the ones defined and use
; by cmpxchg. Since such regex would be complicated to write, just stick
; to the numbered registers. The bottom line is: if this test case fails
; because of that regex, this is likely just the regex being too conservative.
; USE_BASE: movq [[SAVE_rbx_SLOT]], [[SAVE_rbx:%r[0-9]+]]
;
; USE_BASE: movq {{[^ ]+}}, %rbx
; USE_BASE-NEXT: cmpxchg16b
; USE_BASE-NEXT: movq [[SAVE_rbx]], %rbx
;
; DONT_USE_BASE-NOT: movq %rsp, %rbx
; DONT_USE_BASE-NOT: movl %esp, %ebx
; DONT_USE_BASE: cmpxchg
define i1 @cmp_and_swap16(i128 %a, i128 %b, i128* %addr, i32 %n) {
%dummy = alloca i32, i32 %n
tail call void asm sideeffect "nop", "~{rax},~{rcx},~{rdx},~{rsi},~{rdi},~{rbp},~{r8},~{r9},~{r10},~{r11},~{r12},~{r13},~{r14},~{r15}"()
%cmp = cmpxchg i128* %addr, i128 %a, i128 %b seq_cst seq_cst
%res = extractvalue { i128, i1 } %cmp, 1
%idx = getelementptr i32, i32* %dummy, i32 5
store i32 %n, i32* %idx
ret i1 %res
}